Revolutionizing Online Higher Education: A Theoretical Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59923/insights.v1i2.162Keywords:
Online Degree, Constructivism, Connectivism, Pedagogy Theoretical FrameworksAbstract
Understanding the theoretical foundations of online learning becomes increasingly important as education shifts online. This article examines the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and connectivism. The integration of these theories in the design and execution of online learning environments is examined, with a focus on student engagement, technological access, and knowledge networks. The importance of online learning in serving the different requirements of learners around the world is underlined, especially in terms of adaptation and accessibility. The COVID-19 pandemic increased the spread of online education, highlighting the significance of digital infrastructure and training. Accredited online programs, founded on solid theoretical foundations, provide high-quality education comparable to traditional degrees The advantages of online learning are underlined, including self-directed learning, digital literacy, and inclusion. The study takes a qualitative approach, combining literature analysis, interviews with educators, and personal observations to present a full examination of the quality and recognition of online degree programs. Educators may build effective online learning experiences that address the changing needs of modern learners by understanding and utilizing these theoretical frameworks.
References
Alam, M. A. (2023). Connectivism learning theory and connectivist approach in teaching and learning: a review of literature. Bhartiyam International Journal Of Education & Research, 12(2).
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.
Anderson, T. (2011). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University.
Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293
Barclay, C., Donalds, C., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2018). Investigating critical success factors in online learning environments in higher education systems in the Caribbean. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 582–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1476831
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (2024). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164920
Boettcher, J. V, & Conrad, R.-M. (2021). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons.
Brief, P. (2020). Education during COVID-19 and beyond. United Nations, 1–26.
Brieger, E., Arghode, V., & McLean, G. (2020). Connecting theory and practice: reviewing six learning theories to inform online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4/5), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0116
Chand, S. (2024). Constructivism in Education: Exploring the Contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800
Downes, S. (2010). New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.2.1.27-33
Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: a connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w
Fatani, T. H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.
Jena, P. K. (2020). Online learning during lockdown period for covid-19 in India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research (IJMER), 9. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qu38b
Jiang, M. Y., Jong, M. S., Lau, W. W., Chai, C., Liu, K. S., & Park, M. (2022). A scoping review on flipped classroom approach in language education: Challenges, implications and an interaction model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1218–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1789171
Jivram, T., Kavia, S., Poulton, E., Hernandez, A. S., Woodham, L. A., & Poulton, T. (2021). The development of a virtual world problem-based learning tutorial and comparison with interactive text-based tutorials. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 611813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.611813
Karal, Y., & Kontek, O. (2022). Analysis Of Online Text-Based Discussions For Secondary School Students In The Framework Of The Community Of Inquiry. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1137259
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
Maspul, K. A. (2024a). Discovering the Underlying Motivations for Empowering Education Through Innovation. Journal of Information System and Education Development, 2(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.62386/jised.v2i1.58
Maspul, K. A. (2024b). Exploring STEM Education for Real-World Climate Change Concerns to Empower Students as Change Agents. Journal of Physics Education and Science, 1(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/physics.v1i2.249
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Multimedia instruction. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_31
Means, B. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning.
People, U. of the. (2020). UoPeople Annual Survey 2020. https://www.nexford.edu/accreditation
Piaget, J. (2013). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650
Rani, D. (2023). Psychology of learning and development. Shashwat Publication.
Siemens, G. (2004). A learning theory for the digital age.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30.
Srikanth, M. (2024). Exploring the Perceptions and Experiences of E-Learning in Consultancy Organizations: A qualitative study with a focus on the Indian context. University of Essex.
Swargiary, K. (2024). Language and Learning: The Crucial Role of Language in the Teaching-Learning Process. GOOGLE.
University, N. (n.d.). https://www.nexford.org/accreditation.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become? TechTrends, 51, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kurniawan Arif Maspul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
