Effectiveness of AR-Guided Inquiry E-Worksheets on Students’ 21st-Century Skills in Science Lessons, Examined by Gender and Learning Style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59923/joinme.v4i1.760Keywords:
e-Worksheet Guided Inquiry, Augmented Reality, 21st-Century Skills, Learning Styles, GenderAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of using guided inquiry-based e-worksheets incorporating Augmented Reality (AR) on the development of students’ 21st-century skills in science learning, as viewed through the lens of gender and learning style differences. The study employs a quantitative approach with a pretest–posttest control group quasi-experimental design. The research subjects were eighth-grade students at a public junior high school in Bima City, divided into an experimental group (using AR-based e-worksheets) and a control group (using conventional worksheets). Data were collected through critical thinking skill tests, observation sheets for collaboration, communication, and creativity, as well as a learning style questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using ANOVA, GLM, Bonferroni post hoc tests, and n-gain scores. The results indicated that the implementation of AR-integrated guided inquiry e-worksheets significantly influenced the improvement of 21st-century skills (sig. = 0.008 < 0.05), with an average n-gain score of 65.38% (classified as moderately effective). Gender and learning style did not significantly influence learning outcomes, indicating that the learning process was inclusive and adaptive. The highest improvement occurred in creativity skills, followed by communication, collaboration, and critical thinking. These findings confirm that the integration of AR into inquiry-based learning creates a contextual, interactive, and reflective learning environment that supports the comprehensive development of 21st-century skills.
References
Aguillon, S. M., Siegmund, G. F., Petipas, R. H., Drake, A. G., Cotner, S., & Ballen, C. J. (2020). Gender differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Alvarez-Marin, A., & Velazquez-Iturbide, J. A. (2021). Augmented Reality and Engineering Education: A Systematic Review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, S., Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15988
Artacho, E. G., Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martín, J. L., Marín Marín, J. A., & García, G. G. (2020). Teacher Training in Lifelong Learning—The Importance of Digital Competence in the Encouragement of Teaching Innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12072852
Asmoro, S. P., Suciati, & Prayitno, B. A. (2021). Empowering Scientific Thinking Skills of Students with Different Scientific Activity Types through Guided Inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 947–962. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14156a
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2025.1518602
Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review. In Smart Learning Environments (Vol. 9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Chen, C. H. (2020). Impacts of augmented reality and a digital game on students’ science learning with reflection prompts in multimedia learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3057–3076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09834-w
Chen, C. H., & Chu, Y. R. (2024). VR-assisted inquiry-based learning to promote students’ science learning achievements, sense of presence, and global perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19421–19441. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-024-12620-3
Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2025). Learning analytics in inquiry-based learning: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 2131–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9
Crogman, H. T., Cano, V. D., Pacheco, E., Sonawane, R. B., & Boroon, R. (2025). Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Experiential Learning: Transforming Educational Paradigms. Education Sciences, 15(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI15030303
Devika, S. V, Arvind, A., Kaur, R., & Anupama, A. (2024). From Lecture-Based Learning to Problem-Based Learning: A Review on Navigating the Transformation in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(Special Issue 1), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38is1/24229
Dewi, I. P., Ambiyar, Mursyida, L., Effendi, H., Giatman, M., Efrizon, Hanafi, H. F., & Ali, S. K. (2024). Virtual Reality in Algorithm Programming Course: Practicality and Implications for College Students. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(3–2), 1720–1727. https://doi.org/10.62527/JOIV.8.3-2.3113
Dewi, I. P., Kurani, R., Setiawan, H., & Kabatiah, M. (2024). Innovative laboratory learning: a study evaluating the practicality of integrated e-worksheets with augmented reality in electrical machines course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(7), 996–1005. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.7.2127
Djara, J. I., Imaniar, M., Sae, E., & Anin, S. (2023). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD), 3(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v3i2.1907
Dwi Hatria, J., Vrasetya, A., Yulia, P., Matematika, P., & Kerinci, I. (2024). Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Pada Materi Teorema Phytagoras Terhadap Siswa SMPN 2 Sungai Penuh. PRAXIS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.47776/PRAXIS.V3I2.802
Ekatushabe, M., Kwarikunda, D., Muwonge, C. M., Ssenyonga, J., & Schiefele, U. (2021). Relations between perceived teacher’s autonomy support, cognitive appraisals and boredom in physics learning among lower secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00272-5
Ekawati, R., Fiangga, S., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Historical aspect of mathematics on Indonesian mathematics textbook. In A. B. D. Nandiyanto & A. G. Abdullah (Eds.), IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 434, Number 1). Institute of Physics Publishing helen.craven@iop.org. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012001
Gibon, T., Ph, G., Candidate, . D, & Chen, X. (2020). Teacher Educators’ Perspectives and Experiences towards Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 781–798. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13448a
Girwidz, R., & Kohnle, A. (2021). Multimedia and Digital Media in Physics Instruction. Challenges in Physics Education, 297–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87391-2_11
Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422
İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovikj, V. (2023). Gender impact on STEM online learning- a correlational study of gender, personality traits and learning styles in relation to different online teaching modalities. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 30201–30219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14908-x
Isnaeni, N., & Sa’diyah, C. (2024). Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains dengan Earth Exploration: E-Modul Berbasis Augmented Reality Berbantuan Assemblr EDU. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA, 521–530. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/snipa/article/view/3733
Julkifli, F., Hardiansyah, H., & Hakim, A. R. (2025). The Influence of Augmented Reality (Ar) Media on The Learning Outcomes of SMP Negeri 2 Woha Students in Ict Subjects. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(5), 4594–4607. https://doi.org/10.31258/JES.9.5.P.4594-4607
Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st Century Skills. Science Education in Theory and Practice, 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32
Kossyvaki, L., & Curran, S. (2020). The role of technology-mediated music-making in enhancing engagement and social communication in children with autism and intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 24(1), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629518772648
Kumar, H., & Agarwal, M. N. (2025). Filtering the reality: Exploring the dark and bright sides of augmented reality–based filters on social media. Australian Journal of Management, 50(1), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231199356
Lee, K., Malerba, F., & Primi, A. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Changing Global Value Chains and Industrial Upgrading in Emerging Economies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1735386
Lee, T., Wen, Y., Chan, M. Y., Azam, A. B., Looi, C. K., Taib, S., Ooi, C. H., Huang, L. H., Xie, Y., & Cai, Y. (2024). Investigation of virtual & augmented reality classroom learning environments in university STEM education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2617–2632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155838
Lin, L., Bai, S., Qu, M., Wei, X., Wang, L., Wu, F., Liu, B., Zhou, W., & Kuruoǧlu, E. E. (2024). Transformer-Based Light Field Geometry Learning for No-Reference Light Field Image Quality Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 70(2), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2024.3353579
Lo, J. H., Lai, Y. F., & Hsu, T. L. (2021). The Study of AR-Based Learning for Natural Science Inquiry Activities in Taiwan’s Elementary School from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(11), 6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13116283
Mansour, N., Aras, C., Staarman, J. K., & Alotaibi, S. B. M. (2025). Embodied learning of science concepts through augmented reality technology. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8245–8275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13120-0
Martín-Mariscal, A., Torres-Leal, C., Aguilar-Planet, T., & Peralta, E. (2025). The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Industrial Design: A Case Study of Usability Assessment. Applied Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, Page 8725, 15(15), 8725. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP15158725
Rasyid Ridlo, Z., Jember, U., Kalimantan No, J., & Tegalboto, K. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Inkuiri Dengan LKPD Berbasis Diagram Berpikir Multidimensi Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 11(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.25157/JWP.V11I1.13164
Saputra, A. A., & Stiawan, A. (2024). Kajian Review Kurikulum K13 dan Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran di Masa Mendatang. SOSEARCH : Social Science Educational Research, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26740/sosearch.v5n1.p1-17
Sarumaha, M., & Harefa, D. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Terpadu Siswa. Ndrumi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.57094/NDRUMI.V5I1.517
Sejati, A., Sejati, A. E., Syarifuddin, S., Nasruddin, N., Miftachurohmah, N., Nursalam, L. O., & Hariyanto, E. (2021). The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning Model with Edmodo Assisted to Facilitate Critical Thinking Skills. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.4260
Shihab, S. R., Sultana, N., & Samad, A. (2023). Pedagogy Designing With Augmented Reality: a Paradigm Shift in Educational Approaches. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(11), 878–892. https://doi.org/10.58631/INJURITY.V2I11.136
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2024). AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.3221
Sudirman, S., Rodríguez-Nieto, C., Adi, P., Bukhori Muslim, A., Faizah, S., Dwi Susandi, A., & Sa’dijah, C. (2025). Contextualising AR digital module instruction as artifacts in 3D geometry: a didactical tetrahedron action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2530957
Supriadi, S., Robiansyah, F., Wardana, D., Yunia, Y., & Syahda, N. (2023). Didactical design integer operation number of sundanese ethnomathematics online during Covid 19 pandemics with Endog-Endogan games in pre-service elementary school students. In Sugianto, K. Shimizu, E. Cahyono, Masturi, C. P. Lim, & S. Aazmi (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2614). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125833
Treagust, D. F., Qureshi, S. S., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Ojeil, J., Mocerino, M., & Southam, D. C. (2020). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: a Perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry Classes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-018-9712-0
Tumbularani, T., & Diana, R. R. (2024). Analisis Peran Gender Terhadap Perbedaan Minat Dan Partisipasi Anak Dalam Pembelajaran STEAM. As-Sibyan: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.32678/ASSIBYAN.V9I1.9969
Vijayakumar Bharathi, S., & Pande, M. B. (2025). Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 551–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00321-2
Wang, S., Zhao, M., Ding, W., Yang, Q., Li, H., Shao, C., Wang, B., & Liu, Y. (2024). Ecological Suitability Evaluation of City Construction Based on Landscape Ecological Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219178
Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Yang, C. W., & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103830
Yanto, D. T. P., Ganefri, Sukardi, Yanto, J. P., Kurani, R., & Muslim. (2024). Engineering Students’ Acceptance of Augmented Reality Technology Integrated with E-Worksheet in The Laboratory Learning. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 20(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJOE.V20I03.46101
Zhao, E., He, J., Jin, Z., & Wang, Y. (2022). Student-Centered Learning Environment Based on Multimedia Big Data Analysis. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), 9572413. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9572413
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Ibnusaputra, Putri Surya Damayanti, Febriani Febriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












