Global Economic Inequality: A Review of International Law on the Mechanism and Fairness of Free Trade Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59923/rlj.v1i2.267Keywords:
Economic Inequality; Free Trade; International Law; Economic Justice; Trade RegulationAbstract
Global economic inequality has become a fundamental problem in an increasingly complex international trade order. This research aims to analyse the impact of free trade regulations on inter-national economic disparities, with a primary focus on the perspective of international law. Through a juridical-normative approach and comparative studies, the research investigates the mechanisms of international law that affect the distribution of economic benefits among developed and developing countries. The research methodology uses normative legal research methods with data collection techniques through literature study, international document analysis, and review of multilateral trade agreements. Primary data sources include international conventions, trade agreements, and official documents of global trade organisations, while secondary sources include legal literature, academic journals, and reports of international institutions. The results reveal that current free trade regulations tend to discriminate against developing countries, with mechanisms that do not fully take into account the principles of substantive justice. The international trade regime still provides a structural advantage to developed countries, creating a cycle of economic dependency to the detriment of developing countries. Critical analyses show that the current international legal framework has not been able to fully bridge the global economic divide. This research proposes the development of a trade regulation model that is more responsive to different levels of economic development, with fairer compensation and protection mechanisms. Key recommendations include: (1) adjustment of clauses in international trade agreements, (2) establishment of a dynamic system of preferences, and (3) institutional strengthening for more equitable monitoring and dispute settlement. The research conclusion confirms the urgency of transforming the paradigm of international trade law towards a more inclusive and equitable system, taking into account the balance of interests between countries and promoting sustainable economic development.
References
Bappenas Ri. 2022. “Indonesia Dan Dunia.” 5(2).
Chang, H. J. 2007. Bad Samaritans: The Myth Of Free Trade And The Secret History Of Capitalism.
Dariah, Atih Rohaeti. 2005. “Perdagangan Bebas : Idealisme Dan Realitas.” Mimbar 21(1): 115–26.
Imf. 2020. World Economic Outlook.
Kemenkeu.Go.Id. 2023. “Kerangka Ekonomi Makro Dan Pokok-Pokok Kebijakan Fiskal 2024.”
Korah, Revy S. 2016. “Prinsip-Prinsip Eksistensi General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade (Gatt) Dan World Trade Organization (Wto) Dalam Era Pasar Bebas.” Hukum Unsrat 22(7): 44–52.
Lipi.Go.Id. 2007. “Ketimpangan Dan Ketertinggalan.” 18 Juni.
Putri, Vanya Karunia Mulia. 2022. “Alasan Perbedaan Sumber Daya Alam Menjadi Faktor Pendorong Perdagangan Internasional.” Kompas.Com. Https://Www.Kompas.Com/Skola/Read/2022/04/28/083000969/Alasan-Perbedaan-Sumber-Daya-Alam-Menjadi-Faktor-Pendorong-Perdagangan.
Rodrik, D. 2018. The Economic Case For Open Borders.
Stiglitz, J. E. 2006. Making Globalization Work.
Suherman, Ade Maman. 2008. “Perdagangan Bebas (Free Trade) Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Internasional.” Indonesian Journal Of International Law 5(2).
Syahraniah, Nadia. 2015. “Analisis Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Tingkat Ketimpangan Pendapatan, Dan Tingkat Kemiskinan: Studi Kasus Di Negara Asean+3 Periode 1980-2009.”
Ayas T. Wiguna, And Maddaremmeng A. Panennungi. 2019. “Dampak Keterbukaan Perdagangan Terhadap Ketimpangan Pendapatan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia 19(1): 49–61.
World Bank. 2020. Global Economic Prospects.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bayukrisnamurti, Dinda Ayu Hapsari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.