PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All articles submitted to ASSETS JOURNAL will be reviewed using the double-blind review method. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of the reviewers (double-blind review method). In general, each article will be reviewed by one to two reviewers.

The responses of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude:

  1. Revisions Required
  2. Accept Submission
  3. Decline Submission

An article may be rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:

  1. The article does not fit the scope of the journal.
  2. The article does not follow the rules of writing scientific papers or does not follow the author's guidelines.
  3. There are fundamental methodological errors.
  4. The author refuses to make suggested improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis.
  5. There are indications of plagiarism exceeding 25%.

The double-blind review method is a review process conducted without disclosing the identity of the authors to the reviewers, and vice versa, ensuring that the assessment of the article is based solely on its quality and relevance.